Posts by Island Man

20

Potential for new meeting?

by campaign of hate in

i've mentioned it in a few threads, but i'd like to make it a thread of it's own.. i'm going to make the prediction the gb will schedule a new meeting once a month, starting in jan 2016, for watching the jw broadcasting program.

at the moment it's up to each cong to organize a viewing, but soon the gb will take over the arrangements.. i make this assumption based on the fact that they know that a substantial quantity of pubs are not tuning in every month.. by scheduling a meeting once a month, it's easier for the gb/elders/organisation to gauge how many people are watching, and to make sure everyone is fully indoctrinated with what the gb are saying.

it will also keep the rank and file busy busy busy.. if i was a cult leader, that's what i would do.

Island Man

I don't believe they will have a new meeting. What is more likely to happen is that once a month, the normal public talk at the kingdom hall will be replaced by a video presentation from JW broadcasting. Or maybe it could be the service meeting that gets replaced once a month.

5

Earth 2.0 discovered!

by Island Man in

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/23/us/feat-nasa-kepler-planet-discovery/index.html.

this planet is the most earth-like planet discovered to-date.

it's at the right distance from its sun to allow for liquid water and life, and it has a year of 385 days - only 20 days longer than our own year!.

Island Man

http://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/23/us/feat-nasa-kepler-planet-discovery/index.html

This planet is the most earth-like planet discovered to-date. It's at the right distance from its sun to allow for liquid water and life, and it has a year of 385 days - only 20 days longer than our own year!

When dubs point to earth's distance from the sun as evidence of design, just ask them why Kepler-452b is the right distance from its star to be able to sustain life.

4

For the First time.. I have found actual Proof of Jehovah's Witnesses in the Bible!

by LAWHFol in

the scripture is matthew 6:2 "so when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others.".

the similarities are shocking!

here is a list of bullet points, highlighting the ways that the jw's match today.. as a jw your gifts to the needy (in the form of "a life saving work" of 70 hours) are announced from the stage with a microphone, and you are then honored by others, in the form of them applauding in the kingdom hall.. duplicates?.

Island Man

In the bible JWs are mentioned here --> 2 Timothy 3:7; and here --> Ephesians 4:14; and here --> Luke 21:8

24

Resistance is NOT futile!

by Bonsai in

all i want from this life is to be able to wash windows at bethel.. my story.. when i was fresh out of high school and pioneering, i said those exact words to my friends and family.

all i wanted to do was be at the core of the organization where it was the safest.

i gleefully told people that i'd gladly spend the rest of my life washing windows, waiting tables, doing laundry or cleaning bathrooms.

Island Man

"Zeb, according to the JW's putting a flower on a casket is an ancient pagan custom to honor and worship the dead."

What! I never knew that. Those legalistic, self-righteous pharisees!

7

I just realized something that I didn't realize before

by Island Man in

jws teach that only the anointed should partake of the emblems at the memorial because they are in the new covenant but the rest of jws are not.. well, if we follow that logic, shouldn't they also teach that only the anointed should pray in jesus' name?

they teach that jesus is the mediator between jehovah and the anointed only and that the "other sheep" are going to be beneficiaries of the new covenant but are not party to it.

the exact same reasoning applies to the memorial - the anointed are in the covenant but the "other sheep" are not.

Island Man

Thanks for that Listener.

Now watch how easily that Insight article can be tweaked to argue that all JWs can partake of the emblems although they're not all in the New Covenant:

<<There are, thus, others not of the 144,000 “sealed” ones who also ~~pray to Jehovah God in the name of Christ~~ partake of the emblems at the Lord's Evening Meal, putting faith in the merit of his ransom sacrifice. This sacrifice is not only for those ~~for whom Jesus mediates the new covenant~~ with whom Jesus makes a covenant for a kingdom but also for all mankind expressing faith in Christ. (1Jo 2:2) These not in the new covenant also appreciate that “there is not another name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must get saved.” (Ac 4:12) They, too, look to Jesus Christ as their ~~great heavenly High Priest, through whom they can approach God and through whose ministration~~ ransom sacrifice, by which they can get forgiveness of sin. (Heb 4:14-16) Revelation 21:22-24 points out that ‘the nations will walk in the light of New Jerusalem,’ where Jehovah God is the light and the Lamb Jesus Christ is the lamp.>>

The same argument about Jesus having different roles can be used to say that all should partake of the emblems - Jesus serves as a ransom for all and as the mediator of the new covenant. So the anointed partake of the emblems as members in the new covenant and as beneficiaries of christ's ransom sacrifice while the "other sheep" partake only as beneficiaries of the ransom. One faith two hopes. One set of emblems, two significances. See how easy that is?

7

I just realized something that I didn't realize before

by Island Man in

jws teach that only the anointed should partake of the emblems at the memorial because they are in the new covenant but the rest of jws are not.. well, if we follow that logic, shouldn't they also teach that only the anointed should pray in jesus' name?

they teach that jesus is the mediator between jehovah and the anointed only and that the "other sheep" are going to be beneficiaries of the new covenant but are not party to it.

the exact same reasoning applies to the memorial - the anointed are in the covenant but the "other sheep" are not.

Island Man

JWs teach that only the anointed should partake of the emblems at the memorial because they are in the new covenant but the rest of JWs are not.

Well, if we follow that logic, shouldn't they also teach that only the anointed should pray in Jesus' name?

They teach that Jesus is the mediator between Jehovah and the anointed only and that the "other sheep" are going to be beneficiaries of the new covenant but are not party to it. The exact same reasoning applies to the memorial - the anointed are in the covenant but the "other sheep" are not. Therefore what holds true for partaking of the emblems should also hold true for praying in Jesus name - and even more so for the latter, because praying in Jesus' name involves invoking his office of mediator but he is not the mediator for the "other sheep"!

So how is it the JWs don't see this glaring inconsistency? How did I not see this glaring inconsistency?

34

Babylon the Great and the Anti Christ

by Perry in

similar views as those presented here are gaining in popularity in christian circles.

.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgmrfatdvtm.

Island Man

I believe that the writer of Revelation intended Babylon the Great to refer to Jerusalem and the religious leaders of Judaism. This makes the most sense when Revelation is considered in the context of the rest of the NT. Consider the commonalities between the two:

1. Both the Jewish religious system and Babylon the great are said to be full of the blood of prophets, including the blood of Jesus' followers:

(Matthew 23:29-36) . . .“Woe to YOU, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because YOU build the graves of the prophets and decorate the memorial tombs of the righteous ones, . . .31 Therefore YOU are bearing witness against yourselves that YOU are sons of those who murdered the prophets. . . .34 For this reason, here I am sending forth to YOU prophets and wise men and public instructors. Some of them YOU will kill and impale, and some of them YOU will scourge in YOUR synagogues and persecute from city to city; 35 that there may come upon YOU all the righteous blood spilled on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zech·a·riʹah son of Bar·a·chiʹah, whom YOU murdered between the sanctuary and the altar. 36 Truly I say to YOU, All these things will come upon this generation.

(Revelation 17:6) . . .And I saw that the woman was drunk with the blood of the holy ones and with the blood of the witnesses of Jesus. . .

(Revelation 18:24) . . .Yes, in her was found the blood of prophets and of holy ones and of all those who have been slaughtered on the earth.”

The book of Acts portrays the Jews in various places as being instrumental in stirring up persecution against Jesus' followers.

2. Judaism was international in scope, having both ethnic Jewish and foreign proselyte followers in many countries who speak many languages:

(Acts 2:5-11) . . .As it was, there were dwelling in Jerusalem Jews, reverent men, from every nation of those under heaven. 6 So, when this sound occurred, the multitude came together and were bewildered, because each one heard them speaking in his own language. 7 Indeed, they were astonished and began to wonder and say: “See here, all these who are speaking are Gal·i·leʹans, are they not? 8 And yet how is it we are hearing, each one of us, his own language in which we were born? 9 Parʹthi·ans and Medes and Eʹlam·ites, and the inhabitants of Mes·o·po·taʹmi·a, and Ju·deʹa and Cap·pa·doʹci·a, Ponʹtus and the [district of] Asia, 10 and Phrygʹi·a and Pam·phylʹi·a, Egypt and the parts of Libʹy·a, which is toward Cy·reʹne, and sojourners from Rome, both Jews and proselytes, 11 Creʹtans and Arabians, we hear them speaking in our tongues about the magnificent things of God.”

(Revelation 17:15) . . .And he says to me: “The waters that you saw, where the harlot is sitting, mean peoples and crowds and nations and tongues. . .

3. Jesus' instructions to his followers that they flee Jerusalem when they see it surrounded, matches the idea expressed at Revelation 18:4:
(Revelation 18:4) . . .And I heard another voice out of heaven say: “Get out of her, my people, if YOU do not want to share with her in her sins, and if YOU do not want to receive part of her plagues.

The only scripture I see in Revelation that seems to contradict this view is Revelation 17:18: "And the woman whom you saw means the great city that has a kingdom over the kings of the earth. . ."

Jerusalem did not have such great political clout back in the first century. It's possible that Revelation is here referring, not so much to political clout, but just the fact that Judaism was very influential, having adherents throughout the ancient world who would make annual pilgrimages to Jerusalem. Jerusalem was also the figurative palace of the God of the universe, whose kingdom is above that of all the kings of the earth. The religion was also greatly respected by non-members, seen as a source of ancient noble wisdom. Of course this all changed later when the Jews started being accused and expelled from Rome. But the writer is likely talking about the great influence of Judaism early in the 1st century.

The writer of Revelation is basically comparing and contrasting "apostate" Judaism with true Christianity. The NT refers to christians as being the chaste bride of christ, so the writer styles Judaism as the antithesis of that - a promiscuous harlot. The book of Ezekiel also styles Jerusalem/the Jews as a promiscuous harlot. It's really not hard to see that the writer was referring to Jerusalem/Judaism.

If you see the book of Revelation as a purely human work by a man living in the late first century or early second century and trying to guess at the future with the limited knowledge of his own time, then its easier to see how it fits with other bible texts. But if you see it as being a truly prophetic book inspired by God and accurately referring to future events to take place in our time, then it starts to make a lot less sense.

3

Last Spiritual Hard-On

by TheFadingAlbatros in

when the huge hypocrisy of jw.org will be fully unveiled and governments or other authorities are decided to put an end to it, what will happen in the mind of the rank and file jws ?

are they going to have a very last spiritual hard-on, sticking to their guns of so-called "truths" and "new lights" ?.

.

Island Man

"It's the foretold attack of Gog of Magog! Jehovah, please give me the strength to remain faithful to the end and to not be swayed by the vicious satanic propaganda of the governments! Please let me be loyal to your organization no matter what."

17

BBC Radio 4. The Report. ''Jehovah's Witnesses and Child Sexual Abuse''. Thursday 9th July 8pm.

by ThomasCovenant in

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0612hjs

Island Man

Why does the program keep getting pushed back? Could it be that Watchtower is the cause? Maybe they keep setting a date for an interview and each time they cancel and reschedule as a stalling tactic?

28

Was It Designed? Rabies Purposeful Mode of Transmission.

by Island Man in

was it designed?.

rabies' purposeful mode of transmissionrabies is caused by a number of lyssaviruses that attack the cells of the nervous system disrupting their normal function.

symptoms include painful spasms in the muscles of the throat and larynx of patients, accompanied by a strong aversion to drinking liquids - hydrophobia.

Island Man

Satan, has creative powers.............
what scripture pray tell, would support that? none, but she 'reasoned' that it must be so, because satan is an all powerful angel with creative powers and God wouldn't create harmful creatures.

Maybe she thinks it was Satan boasting to Job about the fearsome characteristics of Leviathan . . . or does she think Jehovah was boasting to Job about Satan's creation? LOL.